E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

Unanswered Questions on Privacy and Employment from Supreme Court Overturn of Roe v. Wade

[ad_1]

As the health care industry as a whole comes to grips with the fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, here at Reed Smith we have formed a Reproductive Health Working Group to bring expertise from the across our many specialty areas to help our clients to prepare for the post-Dobbs reality.

To that end, we have generated a series of “unanswered questions” client updates to reflect the issues that a Roe reversal may have for the health care industry. Earlier posts on this blog have shared the parts of that series that focused on pharmacieshealth care providers, and fertility practices, and employee benefit plans.

The Working Group has put together two new updates to branch into the employment and privacy areas.

In Part V of the series, Nicole J. Aiken-Shaban and Wendell J. Bartnick discuss the issues that arise in application of federal and state privacy laws in state’s that prohibit abortion. The alert brings to light, among other important developments, the questions that need to be dealt with when using mobile and computer-based applications that track health information that could be used in criminal proceedings in a state that prohibits abortion.

In Part VI of the series, Emily P. Harbison and Brenda Rosales-Carrillo tackle the questions that arise for employers in the post-Dobbs world. In particular, the questions of how and when employers should take a stance on the decision itself are covered. Additionally, there are questions about employees claiming religious and political viewpoint discrimination that employers will have to navigate.

All of the client updates are available here:

Unanswered Questions Part I: Pharmacies

Unanswered Questions Part II: Health Care Providers

Unanswered Questions Part III: Fertility

Unanswered Questions Part IV: Employee Benefit Plans

Unanswered Questions Part V: Personal Information and Privacy

Unanswered Questions Part VI: Employment

Reed Smith will continue to monitor any state or federal responses to this decision. If you have any questions about this topic or how the Court’s opinion will affect your organization legally, please reach out to the health care lawyers at Reed Smith.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related posts

It Seems so Simple: Why Can’t I Find a Disability Doctor near Me?

U.S. Supreme Court Poised to Resolve Two FCA Circuit Splits

Ignoring cyber threats can affect your job—and haunt your next one

CDC: Wendy’s E. coli Outbreak nears 100 and expands to 6 States

Court Finds That Plaintiff Stated Valid Cause of Action For Negligence Against Adults For Serving Alcohol To Minor in a Fatality Case

Webinar Alert | SEC Changes to Rule 10b5-1 SEC, January 25