E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

U.S. Court of Appeals rules AI cannot be named an inventor


According to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s August 5th ruling in Thaler v. Vidal, No. 2021-2347 (Fed. Cir. 2022), artificial intelligence (“AI”) cannot be named as an inventor on a U.S. patent application. In its opinion, the Federal Circuit considered whether an inventor of a U.S. patent can be anything other than a human being. The Federal Circuit considered the statutory language of the U.S. Patent Act, which includes the definition of an “inventor” but not for an “individual.” Looking to various sources, the Federal Circuit determined that under the U.S. Patent Act, inventors must be humans.

In 2019, Steven Thaler filed two separate patent applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for inventions allegedly developed only by his AI system “DABUS.” When the PTO found the applications to be missing a valid inventor and thus incomplete, it asked Thaler to identify valid inventors. The case made its way up to the Federal Circuit after Thaler unsuccessfully tried to have his AI recognized as an inventor on the applications.

Whether AI can be an inventor is a question being faced around the world. Currently, under U.S., European, and Australian patent laws, AI cannot be an inventor.

Reed Smith’s client alert discussing the Thaler case is available here.


Source link

Related posts

Huge amounts of dodgy food and drinks seized in global operation

American Policyholder Association Membership Summit in Denver on July 12-14

Code of Civil Procedure 874.311 CCP – Short title; application of act (Partition of Real Property Act)

ChatGPT – If It Sounds Too Good To Be True… – Tony Thai and Ashley Carlisle (TGIR Ep. 185)

Statute of Limitations for PPP and EIDL Fraud Extended to Ten Years

Fifty-seven percent of GCs list ESG among their top five risk areas for 2023: survey