E Point Perfect – Interesting and beneficial content
Law \ Legal

Single Home Not Subject to the Housing Accountability Act


The court of appeal held that the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) does not apply to a one-unit single-family home project. Reznitskiy v. County of Marin, 79 Cal.App.5th 1016 (2022). 

Plaintiff applied to the Marin County Planning Commission to build a 4,000-square-foot single-family home on a plot of land in San Anselmo. The Commission denied the application on grounds that the proposed project would adversely affect the existing neighborhood through its relatively large size and environmental effects. Plaintiff sued, arguing that the project was wrongly denied under the HAA. 

On review, the court looked to the structure and purpose of the HAA, observing that the phrase “housing development project” has appeared in the HAA since its inception but has never been fully defined. It found that other references in the statute reflected legislative intent that the statute should apply to a project to construct a “housing development,” not to any project to “develop housing.” Additionally, the stated purpose of the HAA is “to significantly increase the approval and construction of new housing for all economic segments of California’s communities by meaningfully and effectively curbing the capability of local governments to deny, reduce the density for, or render infeasible housing development projects and emergency shelters.” Neither the language of the HAA nor its legislative history supported an interpretation of “housing development project” to include a one-unit single-family home.  Among the core purposes of the HAA is providing for the housing needs of lower income populations by reducing local agencies’ ability to deny higher-density projects — “a scenario that would never apply to a single-unit project.” The court reasoned it was therefore unlikely that the intent of HAA was to give those who could afford to build their own home enhanced protection against rejection of development application based on subjective criteria.


Source link

Related posts

CEQA Challenges to EIR’s Biological and Emergency Evacuation Analyses Rejected

Stupid Expert Tricks Redux – LexBlog

USTR Extends Termination Date for Certain Chinese Products Subject to Section 301 Tariff Exclusions

Takeaways from NAD 2022: The FTC’s Enforcement Priorities, New Technologies, Dark Patterns, and the Usual Suspects

The ESG Disclosure Wave: Final Approval for the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

Union Election Petitions on the Rise, Total Number of FY21 Petitions Eclipses in First Three Quarters of FY22