E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

Judge Carter: MLB’s Antitrust Exemption “Shields” MLB from Minor League Baseball Teams’ Sherman Act Suit

[ad_1]

On Wednesday, Judge Carter granted Major League Baseball’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of four Minor League Baseball teams alleging that MLB violated the Sherman Act by orchestrating an agreement among its clubs to eliminate 40 minor league teams from affiliation with major league clubs. As discussed in a previous post, Plaintiffs argued the Supreme Court had signaled its willingness to reconsider MLB’s exemption from antitrust scrutiny in NCAA v. Alston, 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021).

Judge Carter found that while Plaintiffs had established antitrust standing and had adequately pleaded an antitrust violation, MLB’s antitrust exemption for the “business of baseball” barred the suit. Judge Carter considered both the Plaintiffs’ argument that the Supreme Court was poised to knock out the exception, and the statement of interest filed by the United States “urging the Court to scrutinize baseball’s exemption narrowly,” but concluded that “until the Supreme Court or Congress takes action, the exemption survives; it shields MLB from Plaintiffs’ lawsuit.”

Citing the Second Circuit’s 2017 opinion in Wyckoff v. Office of Commissioner of Baseball, 705 F. App’x 26, 29 (2d Cir. 2017), Judge Carter found that:

Even analyzing the exemption narrowly, the exemption is wide enough to encompass the claims here. As Plaintiffs concede, Wycoff’s interpretation of baseball’s exemption forecloses their case since minor league affiliations are central to the business of baseball. Baseball’s antitrust exemption will not brook this lawsuit; the case is dismissed.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related posts

解除劳动合同事由的司法审查范围——最高院180号指导案例分析

ESG面面观丨ESG视角下的中国企业劳动用工问题探讨

Poundcake recalled in Canada because of plastic in product

A Long Discussion About the Lack of Deceit (II)

Misidentification increases the risk of poisoning as mushroom hunters head out to forage

BC Court of Appeal orders limited counsel assistance for appeal of assault conviction