E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

“How Little Supervision Can We Have?”


The title of this post is the title of this new article authored by Evangeline Lopoo, Vincent Schiraldi, and Timothy Ittner which is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Criminology. Here is its abstract:

Use of probation and parole has declined since its peak in 2007 but still intrudes into the lives of 3.9 million Americans at a scale deemed mass supervision.  Originally intended as an alternative to incarceration and a means of rehabilitation for those who have committed crimes, supervision often functions as a trip wire for further criminal legal system contact. This review questions the utility of supervision, as research shows that, in toto, it currently provides neither diversion from incarceration nor rehabilitation.  Analysis of national supervision, crime, and carceral data since 1980 reveals that supervision has little effect on future crime and is not a replacement for incarceration.  Case studies from California and New York City indicate that concerted efforts to reduce the scope of mass supervision can effectively be achieved through sentencing reform, case diversion, and supervisory/legal system department policy change, among other factors, without increasing crime.  Therefore, we suggest extensive downsizing of supervision or experimentation with its abolition and offer actionable steps to enact each possibility.



Source link

Related posts

New Complaint – SEC v. Alexandra Robert, et al.

Dawn Zuniga

CPW’s David Oberly Discusses Biometric Privacy Compliance Strategies in Advance of Cothron BIPA Claim Accrual Ruling in Biometric Update

Dawn Zuniga

Who Needs a Lawyer in the Eleventh Circuit?

Dawn Zuniga

EDTX Denies Discovery of Litigation Funding Documents

Dawn Zuniga

上海官宣支持NFT交易平台,投资人如何筛选优质NFT平台投资标的?

Dawn Zuniga

At-risk programs for law firms: Applying data analytics to strengthen client relationships and increase retention

Dawn Zuniga