E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

Defense-Side Funder Faces Cost Order in Australian Case

While the vast majority of litigation funding continues to be devoted to financing actions by plaintiffs, there has been a noticeable increase in firms discussing and actively pursuing defense-side funding. However, as a recent case in Australia is demonstrating, this kind of third-party funding is not without its challenges, and may represent a risky proposition where there is the possibility of cost orders being leveled against the funder.

This content is for 1-3 Team Members, 7 Day Trial, 4-10 Team Members, 4-10 Team Members (Sponsored Member), 11-20 Team Members, 11-20 Team Members (Sponsored Member), $695 One Time Membership Rate Lock, Single Annual Subscription, Additional 1 User, Additional 2 Users, Additional 3 Users, Additional 4 Users, 6 Pack, Additional 9 Users, Single Annual Subscription (Paid Monthly), and Single Annual Subscription (Paid Quarterly) members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.

The post Defense-Side Funder Faces Cost Order in Australian Case appeared first on Litigation Finance Journal.

Source link

Related posts

CFPB’s Increasingly Active Interest in Credit Reporting

Do Defamers Deserve Pseudonymity? – LexBlog

No More Exceptions: What to Do When the California Privacy Exemptions for Employee, Applicant and B2B Data Expire on January 1, 2023

Paul Weiss Discusses DOJ Loss in Challenge to U.S. Sugar-Imperial Sugar Deal

Center for Produce Safety calls for preliminary research proposals

DWP, Medical Only Claims, And Other Illinois Work Comp Questions