E Point Perfect – Interesting and beneficial content
Law \ Legal

Damage Claim For Denying Lincoln Memorial Religious Demonstration Permit Dismissed


In Ferguson v. Owen, (D DC, July 8, 2022), a D.C. federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, a suit for damages against the head of the National Park Service Division of Permits Management for refusing plaintiff a permit for a 4-month long demonstration at the Lincoln Memorial.  He was offered a permit to demonstrate at the Korean War Veterans Memorial site. Plaintiff, a street musician, wanted to convey a religious/ political message.  The court rejected plaintiff’s RFRA claim, finding that the denial had not imposed a substantial burden on his religious exercise, saying in part:

Must an individual have a central religious belief that requires demonstrating at the Lincoln Memorial in order for the denial of permit applications to demonstrate at the Lincoln Memorial—accompanied by the approval of permit applications to demonstrate at nearby locations—to constitute a substantial burden under RFRA? The answer to this question is yes.

The court also rejected plaintiff’s 1st Amendment claim, refusing to extend implied Bivens causes of action to this type of claim.


Source link

Related posts

Should You Disclose the Identity of a Shareholder Proponent in Your Proxy?

Defendant’s s. 974.06 motion is barred because he is no longer in custody under the conviction he’s challenging

[Educational Webcast] Now You See It, Now You Don’t: eDiscovery Challenges and Apple’s iOS 16 Release

Sponsored Content: 9 Creative Ways Legal Document Automation Drives Greater Efficiencies

从国知局近期公函及座谈会看《商标法》修改的新动向 – LexBlog