E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

Chancery Denies Frivolous Recusal Motion

[ad_1]

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently denied a frivolous pro se motion to recuse, and the introduction to the reasons why the motion was denied might be used as an eloquent preface for a rebuttal to almost any frivolous accusation that a recipient may be reluctant to dignify with a response.

In Wollner v. PearPop Inc., C.A. No. 2021-0157-KSJM (Del. Ch. July 9, 2022), the Court began its analysis with the following “money quote”:

In a world of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information, [the pro se movant]’s theory falls in one of the first two categories because it is based on totally false premises. At the risk of seeming to credit by response a theory too divorced from reality to warrant one, I can easily dispel it….”

Slip op. at 3.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related posts

CDC’S COVID-19 Guidance Changes… Again

Air Travelers No Longer Required to Present Negative COVID-19 Test

ECB guidelines on transferability to support the resolvability assessment for transfer strategies

Will the “Major Questions Principle” Block the SEC’s Proposed Climate Change Disclosure Rules?

California Mandatory Postings and Pamphlets – What’s New for 2023

绿色金融:补贴渐行渐远,生物质发电项目的碳市场机遇