E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

Attorney Goldstein Argues in Front of Supreme Court of Pennsylvania


Oral Argument

Attorney Goldstein at Oral Argument

Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer Zak T. Goldstein, Esquire, recently argued in front of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Commonwealth v. J.W. In that case, the defendant had been convicted in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas of aggravated assault and related charges. The Commonwealth alleged that J.W. shot another man in the head and injured him. J.W.’s co-defendant was wearing a probation GPS monitor at the time, and video evidence showed J.W. and the co-defendant together earlier in the day. The GPS evidence placed the co-defendant at the scene of the shooting. Video surveillance also showed that more than one person was involved, so the Montgomery County jury convicted J.W. based on his link to the co-defendant from being seen with him earlier in the day, the GPS evidence, and a number of recanted statements from witnesses.

J.W. was represented by different counsel at trial. He retained Attorney Goldstein for the appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court. On appeal, Attorney Goldstein argued that the GPS evidence was hearsay which should not have been introduced into evidence at trial. The Commonwealth had agreed that the GPS evidence was hearsay but argued that it was admissible pursuant to the business records exception, which allows otherwise inadmissible hearsay to be introduced when the hearsay is kept in the normal course of business and appears to be reliable.

Argument Photo

Attorney Goldstein

The Superior Court rejected the argument, holding in a matter of first impression that computer generated evidence like GPS records is never hearsay because they are the statements of computers rather than humans. Attorney Goldstein filed a petition for allowance of appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court granted the petition to determine whether the rule against hearsay prohibits evidence like GPS records. Attorney Goldstein therefore participated in oral argument before the Court in Philadelphia, and the Court will now decide this important issue of law.

Facing criminal charges? We can help.

Criminal Defense Lawyers

Goldstein Mehta LLC Criminal Defense Lawyers

If you are facing criminal charges or under investigation by the police, we can help. We have successfully defended thousands of clients against criminal charges in courts throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We have successfully obtained full acquittals in cases involving charges such as Conspiracy, Aggravated Assault, Rape, and Murder. We have also won criminal appeals in state and federal court. Our award-winning Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers offer a free criminal defense strategy session to any potential client. Call 267-225-2545 to speak with an experienced and understanding defense attorney today.


Source link

Related posts

So, who made the Tara?

Sephora Lawsuit Signals California Enforcement of CCPA’s Global Privacy Control Requirement

Minnesota Supreme Court recognizes the common interest doctrine

10 Key Focus Areas for UK-Regulated Financial Services Firms in 2023

State AG Updates: January 5-18, 2023

Arbitration stepping into the world of Metaverse