E Point Perfect
Law \ Legal

An Argument for Greater Transparency in Third-Party Litigation Funding


Disclosure in litigation funding continues to be one of the leading topics of discussion for the industry, particularly driven by recent U.S. patent dispute cases that have led to fiercely contested disclosure orders by federal courts. Whilst funders are largely resistant towards blanket disclosure orders, especially when it comes to the details of litigation funding agreements, one member organization that seeks to deter invalid patent assertions has made the argument for greater transparency.

This content is for 1-3 Team Members, 7 Day Trial, 4-10 Team Members, 4-10 Team Members (Sponsored Member), 11-20 Team Members, 11-20 Team Members (Sponsored Member), $695 One Time Membership Rate Lock, Single Annual Subscription, Additional 1 User, Additional 2 Users, Additional 3 Users, Additional 4 Users, 6 Pack, Additional 9 Users, Single Annual Subscription (Paid Monthly), Single Annual Subscription (Paid Quarterly), and Additional 7 Users members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.

The post An Argument for Greater Transparency in Third-Party Litigation Funding appeared first on Litigation Finance Journal.


Source link

Related posts

E2 Law Podcast: Episode 20 | Empire Environmental – Review of New York’s Cap-and-Invest Program to Reduce Emissions and Achieve Climate Goals

New redundancy criteria decision not all that it seems (UK)

Third-party food delivery services are offered guidance from federal agencies


Decision Benefits Franchise Businesses and Finds Alston Bars Challenge to No-Poach Agreements

JUST ASK: The Rules of Research for New Associates